Example: Canada goose with wings extended.
I love me some birds. In this photograph I got the focus point I wanted and the sharpness and the exposure worked. exposure data: 1/1250 @ f/8, ISO 800, Av, spot metering with the Canon EOS 5D Mk2 and my good old Tamron 200-500mm f/5.6-6.3 lens at 500mm.
Once I open this image in Adobe's Lightroom3, however I really start to make a photograph that looks quite different.
I want an image that looks like it was taken in such a way that the colors were enhanced and the lighting made dramatic and the framing was just right. Much of that must be done when shooting. Some of that can only be done in developing.
If you think about film photography you'll see why some people whom I respect say it's not a photograph until it's developed and printed. If someone wants to buy one of my artistic photographs they'll want it as a print, not as a digital file. Developing isn't just about how the file looks. It's about how it will look in print.
Whenever I hear someone say they don't develop their images because they work to "get it right in the camera" I suspect that the person hasn't been in photography very long. That whole idea only applies to digital photography. If you shoot film you must develop that negative and print or you won't see a positive image.
It's a matter of taste and intent but once you get familiar with whatever developing software you have, even that which is shipped with the camera, you'll have a much wider range of possibilities for your images.



Enjoy your blog. Keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete